Chronic Pain Relief Now

Call 1-888-E-STIMULATE
Chronic Pain Relief


 Information
Mind and Body
Fibromyalgia
Migraine Pain
Back Pain
Carpal Tunnel
Arthritis Pain
M.D. Surveys
Testimonials
Endorsements
Our Site Map
Prescribing Info
Contact Us
 

Pg. 3

<Previous Page  First Page^  Next Page>

Chronic Pain Cranial Electrotherapy StimulationThe Use of Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation in the Management of Chronic Pain: A Review

Daniel L. Kirsch  and Ray B. Smith

NeuroRehabilitation, 14(2):85-94, 2000


Fig. 4. Frequency of migraine headaches, times intensity

the Profile of Mood States, a standardized psychological test of depression, anxiety, fatigue, and cognitive function, among other factors.


It was found that the CES treated patients improved significantly on every measure following three weeks of CES treatment. Neither the sham-treated patients nor the placebo control patients showed improvement on any area measured. These results are given in Fig. 2, where it can also be seen that the patients who received open clinical treatment following the double-blind phase of the research, all at self chosen current intensity settings, actually fared better than those who received the pre set, subsensation level treatment, as would be expected.


A large clinical practice in Southern California chose to complete their research with the open clinical protocol [24]. Again, patients received CES treatments, one hour per day for three weeks. All tests and measures were as described above. They halted the study after the first 20 patients had completed it to see what the results had been. These results can be seen in Fig. 3. The researchers were so impressed that they decided to run the study for an additional 12 months, and are in that process as of this writing.


Researchers at the Louisiana State University Medical School pain clinic are currently implementing the fibromyalgia study double-blind protocol [25], and several other clinics and hospitals are reviewing the protocol for possible participation.

 

3.3. Research in headaches


Perhaps the earliest US study on headache was done as a Masters Degree thesis at North Texas State University in Denton. In that double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 18 migraine headache patients were divided into three groups of 6 each. In the treated group, CES was given for 45 minutes a day for 15 days, Monday through Friday. Over a two week period immediately following the study it was found that CES treated patients, but not the sham-treated or placebo control patients, reported significant reductions in both headache intensity and duration [26].

In another study of migraine headaches, this time a doctoral dissertation research project, 36 patients were assigned to biofeedback (BF), CES, or biofeedback combined with CES. Eight treatment sessions of 15 minutes each were given over a two to three week period. The patients measured the frequency-time intensity of headaches daily during the eight days of therapy, then over a one month, a two month and a three month period following the treatments.

There was no difference between the groups at the end of the eight treatment sessions, but a steadily increasing cumulative improvement took place over the three month period following the study, as shown in Fig. 4. The biofeedback group had an accumulative improvement of 70% while the combined BF/CES group, the group that did best over all, had an accumulative improvement of 400% by the end of the third month [27].



 

3.4. Research on dental pain

In a double-blind dental study, 50 patients were divided into two groups, 30 receiving CES and 20 receiving sham CES treatment. They were randomly assigned to procedures including oral surgery, restoration, tooth extractions, root planing, pulp extirpation, and temporomandibular joint therapy.

It was found that 24 of the 30 CES patients (80%) were able to undergo dental procedures without other anesthesia, while 15 of the 20 sham treated patients (75%) requested anesthesia. In the operative groups, 13 of 14 CES patients (93%) did not require anesthesia, while 4 of 7 sham-treated patients (43%) did. All patients required anesthesia for endodontic procedures. All CES patients stated that the use of CES would be their first choice in future dental visits [30].

Another dentist used CES in 600 dental procedures over a 12-month period. 76% of the patients reported a 90% or greater reduction in pain with CES and did not request additional anesthetics. When the results were broken down by procedure, 83% of the patients who underwent 71 scaling and prophylactic procedures did not ask for additional anesthesia, compared with 76% of those undergoing 473 restorative procedures, and 55% of those undergoing 29 crown preparations.

A serendipitous, but not surprising finding was that all patients reported feeling more relaxed than usual while in the dental chair [31].

 

<Previous Page  First Page^  Next Page>

NeuroRehabilitation • 14(2):85-94 • 2000

Used with permission of Electromedical Products International, Inc.

©2006 by
 

Disclaimers-  Alpha-Stim® is manufactured by Electromedical Products International, Inc. (EPI).  Chronic Pain Relief Now.Com and Moeller Medical, LLC are  not associated with EPI except to the extent of acting distributors of the Alpha-Stim® device.  The Alpha-Stim® name and the Alpha-Stim® logo are trademarks of EPI.
United States readers note:
Material on this site is being provided only for educational information and as background material for potential researchers, not for promotional purposes.
Chronic Pain Relief Now.Com and Moeller Medical, LLC express no opinion with regard to representations made herein.  Chronic Pain Relief Now.Com and Moeller Medical, LLC support only those representations contained within the labeling of the Alpha-Stim® products.
.

The Use of Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation in the Management of Chronic Pain